[Development] Code Coverage of QtBase - new report available online

[Thiago Macieira]

On sexta-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2013 11.26.20, Sébastien Fricker wrote:
> > qtsdk master doesn't make sense for daily reports because it only moves
> > during release times. It would need to be the qt5.git repository and we
> > go back to a choice of the three branches.
> 
> So you would prefer to track the coverage of the dev branch of each module?

Yes, I would prefer coverage on dev, which is where development is happening 
and where, potentially, new code without enough coverage could be merged in.

Tracking stable would work too, for now. Maybe not in the future.

Tracking releases is not useful. By the time we get any reports, it's too 
late.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130201/3fb8b7f2/attachment.sig>