[Development] Qt modules missing mandatory LICENSE files

[Thiago Macieira]

On sexta-feira, 8 de fevereiro de 2013 08.04.54, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be
> shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently
> only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker
> for distributing the modules.
> 
> I started up with qtchooser [1] (merged) and submitted another one for
> qtxmlpatterns [2].
> 
> [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47111
> [2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47191
> 
> If it's ok, I could go on with the other modules as well, or you could
> do that globally. But this discussion opener is here in case there is
> something to wonder or question, or a need to check with the legal
> department.

I think it's ok. Let's just do it.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130207/49ffd05b/attachment.sig>