[Development] Qt modules missing mandatory LICENSE files
Timo Jyrinki
timo.jyrinki at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 08:23:38 CET 2013
2013/2/8 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>:
>> I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be
>> shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently
>> only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker
>> for distributing the modules.
...
> I think it's ok. Let's just do it.
Thanks. I did so for the core modules except qtwebkit which doesn't
need anything more besides the LGPL license text already included.
qtjsbackend also has only minimal amount of code under these.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47235 (qtscript)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47236 (qtdeclarative)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47237 (qtsvg)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47238 (qtgraphicaleffects)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47239 (qtmultimedia)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47240 (qttools)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47241 (qtquick1)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47243 (qttranslations)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47244 (qtdoc)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47245 (qtimageformats)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47246 (qtactiveqt)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47247 (qtjsbackend)
The modules not part of official releases should also be updated at some point.
-Timo
More information about the Development
mailing list