[Development] Qt modules missing mandatory LICENSE files
Paul Olav Tvete
paul.tvete at digia.com
Fri Feb 15 11:52:40 CET 2013
On Friday 15 February 2013 11:43:10 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> > At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
> > and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
> > for them at that time as part of the process.
> I don't know why you're packaging those.
> You understand that they are not 'part of Qt 5', right?
> And you understand that they are not stable in any way and their API will
> likely change, and they will not be part of Qt 5.1, and they may never be
> part of a Qt release?
AFAIK, QtWayland is planned to be part of Qt 5.1. (Parts of the module will be
marked as experimental.)
More information about the Development