[Development] Qt modules missing mandatory LICENSE files

[Stephen Kelly]

On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
> and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
> for them at that time as part of the process. 

I don't know why you're packaging those. 

You understand that they are not 'part of Qt 5', right? 

And you understand that they are not stable in any way and their API will 
likely change, and they will not be part of Qt 5.1, and they may never be part 
of a Qt release?

Thanks,

-- 
Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130215/f23e9387/attachment.sig>