[Development] [QA] Suggestion -- Bug Report Description Template
Olivier Goffart
olivier at woboq.com
Tue Feb 19 18:03:49 CET 2013
On Tuesday 19 February 2013 16:26:31 Mitch Curtis wrote:
> On 02/19/2013 03:33 PM, Motyka Rafal wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In order to address some of the recent questions about error management,
> > and to improve the quality of bug reports, I want to suggest using the
> > following template:
> >
> > ==================================================
> > PACKAGE NAME:
> > < e.g.
> > qt-windows-opensource-5.0.1-mingw47_32-x86-offline-2013-01-29-424.exe >
> >
> > STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
> > 1.
> > 2.
> > ...
> >
> > ACTUAL RESULT:
> > ...
> >
> > EXPECTED RESULT:
> > ...
> > ==================================================
> >
> > The Description field would be automatically populated with that
> > template when a new bug report is being created.
> >
> > Please feel free to comment on it. If there are no serious complaints I
> > suggest to implement it soon.
>
> Sounds good. I'd like to see some mention of a reproducible example
> being required for non-trivial bugs (that is, bugs for which a list of
> "steps to reproduce" is not adequate due to the steps being too
> complex); either in the description field as a {code}snippet{code} or as
> an attachment.
I agree.
Those fields are fine for user applications. But for libraries like Qt, the
most important part of the bug report is a small compilable example.
(Ideally a single cpp file)
Normally, one should read that page before reporting a bug:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/ReportingBugsInQt
Maybe that page should be linked from the "Create Issue" form.
Also, what would be nice is a field specifying the last working version for
regression, so we can prioritize better
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTJIRA-122
--
Olivier
Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com
More information about the Development
mailing list