[Development] QtMultimedia BIC / header cleanliness issue

[Martin Sandsmark]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:56:27PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> this isn't about a cover-up, but about not making a fuss about a virtual
> non-event (no pun intended). changelog entries, etc. are ok (like for
> any bugfix), while changing the soversion seems just a bit over the top.

Why is bumping the so-version a lot of fuss?

(IMHO this says a lot about QtMultimedia in general, but I'll crawl back
under my bridge instead of complain about that...)


-- 
Martin Sandsmark