[Development] Nominating Iikka Eklund as approver

[Thiago Macieira]

On quinta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2013 12.17.20, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Parts of the packaging process is in gerrit (namely qtsdk/qtsdk.git),
> > 
> > so he should be really  be able to stage things
> >
> > 
> 
> uh, wtf?! nothing against iikka specifically (couldn't judge it), but
> this is so totally not a reason to make someone an approver. in areas

Even taking in consideration what the other replies have said, I still 
disagree with Ossi's original comment.

Take again my replies to Uli Schlachter's approver proposal: we have to make 
an exception when a specific skill is required in the project. Iikka's bringing 
a specific skill that we need, in addition to his current contributions.

This of course requires that the newly-minted approver stays on, helping us 
with that particular skill.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130124/f4d906a1/attachment.sig>