[Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

[Thiago Macieira]

On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 19.47.11, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 29.01.2013 13:05, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > moin *,
> > 
> > 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more.
> > seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning.
> > therefore i'd like to urge everyone to give their pending changes which
> > haven't seen activity for a long time a honest look.
> > please explicitly mark the ones you still want to work on by adding a
> > comment. everything which has no indication of (planned) activity in a
> > few weeks will be abandoned by administrative action.
> > if you are an ex-troll/-nokian, please also check the dashboard of your
> > alter ego.
> > if you are a maintainer, give identified drive-by contributors a ping.
> > i'd also like to encourage everyone to adopt orphaned changes they have
> > an interest in.
> 
> What about WIP changes? Could they stay open?
> It is obvious that they don't need a review.

You can't tell apart a real work-in-progress (but not progressed in months) 
from an effectively abandoned WIP.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130129/337c6c0c/attachment.sig>