[Development] PROPOSAL: merge #qt-qml and #qt-components to #qt-quick
Nurmi J-P
jpnurmi at digia.com
Mon Jul 8 15:45:21 CEST 2013
On Jul 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Nurmi J-P <jpnurmi at digia.com> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Alan Alpert <416365416c at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Nurmi J-P <jpnurmi at digia.com> wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> A new #qt-quick channel was established a couple of weeks ago, and the users of the former #qt-components were redirected to #qt-quick. Now that the dust has settled, I'd like to propose taking the next step - to merge #qt-qml to #qt-quick.
>>>
>>> Users are increasingly confused by the separation between the two channels, and the questions seem to be pretty mixed too. Therefore I'm still voting for having a single #qt-quick channel for Qt Quick and QML users. Time will tell whether development discussions should be kept there or not.
>>>
>>
>> I'm okay with that. If we want to reclaim #qt-qml for development we
>> can do it after all the users have switched over. Currently they just
>> have inexplicable overlap, so one channel would be an improvement.
>>
>> --
>> Alan Alpert
>
>
> Not all users follow the mailing lists, so I've also asked from people hanging on #qt-qml. The feedback for this idea of merging with #qt-quick has been very positive. Unless someone comes up with reasonable objections, we will turn on the redirect on Monday 8th July that is one week from the proposal e-mail quoted above.
>
> --
> J-P Nurmi
>
FYI, I've turned on the redirect. See You on #qt-quick! :)
--
J-P Nurmi
More information about the Development
mailing list