[Development] QtQuick ML

[Alan Alpert]

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Alan Alpert <416365416c at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
> <oswald.buddenhagen at digia.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 06:18:43AM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
>>> <oswald.buddenhagen at digia.com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:10:31AM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote:
>>> >>  I'd first like to know if we've come to a decision on
>>> >> whether to have a separate qt-quick at qt-project.org ML?
>>> >>
>>> > i wonder how many more times you want to re-iterate this? do you have
>>> > any *new* arguments in favor of this fragmentation?
>>>
>>> You're right. Nothing has changed in the last month since this was
>>> proposed and no-one objected.
>>>
>> nice try.
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-December/008376.html
>
> Wrong, I'm referring to this:
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-components/2013-June/000304.html

I just noticed this thread could be confusing for some, so I'd like to clarify:

The initial email (today) contained arguments straight from the
Qt-Components list discussion. So those were new to this list (not in
the december thread) but unchanged from a month ago on the components
list.

Those not keen on trying to weave in the threads across both lists
should just reply to the initial email and forget the rest...

--
Alan Alpert