[Development] [Interest] [Announce] Qt 5.1 released

Laszlo Papp lpapp at kde.org
Mon Jul 29 15:08:47 CEST 2013

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Jake Thomas Petroules <
jake.petroules at petroules.com> wrote:

> Personally I still think it would be far more logical to delegate the
> ANGLE vs OpenGL decision to runtime, by including plugins for both backends
> with all Windows distributions.
> Having different packages seems to confuse a lot of Qt developers and
> complicates deployment matters, whereas a plugin based approach would solve
> these issues and also give end users the option to try a different graphics
> backend if the current one isn't working out for them. Many game engines do
> this, so why shouldn't Qt also be able to?

Good question.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130729/4779790c/attachment.html>

More information about the Development mailing list