[Development] Header diff for QtQml
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Thu Jun 27 02:28:19 CEST 2013
On quarta-feira, 26 de junho de 2013 17.23.56, Alan Alpert wrote:
> Also qqml.h now includes qdebug.h. While not harmful, do we have a
> convention of not including that in public headers?
Does it have a reason for the include? For example, does it declare debugging
operators for anything? If not, it's probably accidental and can be safely
Removing includes is *technically* a source-incompatible change, but one we
tolerate. glibc and GCC have been cleaning up their headers for the past half
a dozen releases; every upgrade turns up missing includes that people relied
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Development