[Development] QtMof playground repository renaming and CI activation ?

[Sandro Andrade]

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
<oswald.buddenhagen at digia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:03:43PM -0300, Sandro Andrade wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether this request is actually feasible but would we
>> have too much impact if we rename qtmof playground repository to qtmodeling ?
>>
> i have it figured out now, so actually renaming it is trivial and
> lossless.
> however, consider that there is an impact on all existing users of the
> repository, as they need to adjust the remote.

That wouldn't generate too much noise since I'm currently the only
maintainer, one other person has been testing it, and there is only
one clone in gitorious. I can contact it directly whether clones aren't
automatically updated.

>
> also, our new policy is to put the module in its final destination and
> represent its maturity via external means (wiki, etc.) (though these
> means are not actually implemented yet, i think). so where do you
> envison this repository to end up?

IIRC, that's intended to become a Qt Add-On, but it still in playground.

Thanks,
Sandro

>
>> Also, could we have CI running on it ?
>>
> that's for someone else to comment on ...
>
> regards
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development