[Development] QtMof playground repository renaming and CI activation ?

[Sandro Andrade]

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sandro Andrade <sandroandrade at kde.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
> <oswald.buddenhagen at digia.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:03:43PM -0300, Sandro Andrade wrote:
>>> I'm not sure whether this request is actually feasible but would we
>>> have too much impact if we rename qtmof playground repository to qtmodeling ?
>>>
>> i have it figured out now, so actually renaming it is trivial and
>> lossless.
>> however, consider that there is an impact on all existing users of the
>> repository, as they need to adjust the remote.
>
> That wouldn't generate too much noise since I'm currently the only
> maintainer, one other person has been testing it, and there is only
> one clone in gitorious. I can contact it directly whether clones aren't
> automatically updated.
>
>>
>> also, our new policy is to put the module in its final destination and
>> represent its maturity via external means (wiki, etc.) (though these
>> means are not actually implemented yet, i think). so where do you
>> envison this repository to end up?
>
> IIRC, that's intended to become a Qt Add-On, but it still in playground.

Oswald, if everything is fine could you or Sergio do the repository renaming ?

Thanks,
Sandro

>
> Thanks,
> Sandro
>
>>
>>> Also, could we have CI running on it ?
>>>
>> that's for someone else to comment on ...
>>
>> regards
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development