[Development] File Selectors API, still for 5.1?

[Thiago Macieira]

On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.37, Alan Alpert wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Konstantin Ritt <ritt.ks at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can't it be a private API in 5.1?
> 
> That's a good idea. Why didn't I think of that? That also provides
> more flexibility while working towards unification.
> 
> If it goes in as private API, does it still fall subject to the
> feature freeze? Or would feature freeze only apply to its attempt to
> go public next release?

Private API is not subject to feature freeze.

Only to proving to the maintainer that the code won't destabilise the build 
and does belong in that library.

But please check with the Plasma devs whether they'll accept using private 
API. Distro maintainers do not like when someone uses private API.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130325/e1fd6014/attachment.sig>