[Development] Policy: supplying the preferred format for modifications for everything we ship

[Thiago Macieira]

On domingo, 29 de setembro de 2013 22:26:41, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> As we do not modify those files, but take them from upstream, having a
> README  that say where the file are from is enough.
> I don't see why it should be part of the tarball. (and especially they
> should  not be in the git repositories)

I'm not asking for them to be in the tarball. Just pointing to other URLs is 
not enough.

> And most of the JS or images are not under LGPL anyway.

But our sources are, which govern the full tarball.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130929/0aa50548/attachment.sig>