[Development] One 'qt' branch to rule 'em all!

Stephen Kelly stephen.kelly at kdab.com
Tue Apr 1 14:50:30 CEST 2014


On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 11:12:18 Koehne Kai wrote:
> I had a discussion with this with a couple of people, including Lars. In the
> end we realized that both models are too complicated, and we should rather
> have only one branch. Reality shows that we're working pretty sequential,
> anyway: Everyone should concentrate right now on Qt 5.3.0, and afterwards
> on Qt 5.3.1. When Qt 5.3.1 is out we can then decide whether we want to go
> for Qt 5.3.2, or for Qt 5.4.0 ... It's up to you of course to prepare
> patches for the next version locally (it's git!), but they should be only
> submitted when the next version is being created.

Can we re-introduce ifdefs in 'the branch' for Qt 4.8.x/5.y.z so that we can 
compile either from the same codebase?

Thanks,

-- 
Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com

Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20140401/aac8dab0/attachment.sig>


More information about the Development mailing list