[Development] One 'qt' branch to rule 'em all!
Rutledge Shawn
Shawn.Rutledge at digia.com
Tue Apr 1 15:12:27 CEST 2014
On 1 Apr 2014, at 2:37 PM, André Somers wrote:
> Diego Iastrubni schreef op 1-4-2014 14:17:
>> I agree.
>>
>> As we move to a more linear development cycle, we can finally drop
>> git and update to svn, "where we are going we don't need branches"
>> anyway.
> I'd actually like to suggest an upgrade to CSV then.
There is already code available for parsing comma-separated values.
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Handling_CSV
Or were you referring to http://www.cvs.com/?
More information about the Development
mailing list