[Development] One 'qt' branch to rule 'em all!

Rutledge Shawn Shawn.Rutledge at digia.com
Tue Apr 1 15:12:27 CEST 2014


On 1 Apr 2014, at 2:37 PM, André Somers wrote:

> Diego Iastrubni schreef op 1-4-2014 14:17:
>> I agree.
>> 
>> As we move to  a more linear development cycle, we can finally drop
>> git and update to svn, "where we are going we don't need branches"
>> anyway.
> I'd actually like to suggest an upgrade to CSV then.

There is already code available for parsing comma-separated values.

http://qt-project.org/wiki/Handling_CSV

Or were you referring to http://www.cvs.com/?




More information about the Development mailing list