[Development] Perceptions/Understandings of the QML language [was: Question about Qt's future]

[André Pönitz]

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:12:47AM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote:
> Yes, I agree that more rigorous and agreed definitions would be
> helpful. It also takes time, and impedes innovation, so I'm not sure
> if we're quite mature enough to "nail down" QML just yet. Should be
> soon though, in the next few years.

To get this straight: After five years of development the "Maintainer" of
the Qt Declarative module is neither able nor willing to give a simple
definition of what "QML" is.

_This_ explains a lot.

Andre'