[Development] QWebsocket remark

Kurt Pattyn pattyn.kurt at gmail.com
Wed Feb 19 08:14:21 CET 2014


Hi Martin,
> On 17 Feb 2014, at 19:39, Martin Koller <kollix at aon.at> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> had a quick look into the implementation as I wanted to use it in my existing webserver.
> However, the API does not provide a way to use it for an _existing_ tcp communication channel.
Do you mean a QTcpSocket?
> 
> What would be great is if you modify QWebSocketDataProcessor in some way so that it just
> get's data from anywhere and therefore also make it a public class.
Well, it takes a QIODevice as data source, so that shouldn't be a problem (as you stated yourself).
As you probably know, there is a feature freeze for Qt 5.3; so changing the API is currently not a good idea.
Instead of making QWebSocketDataProcessor public, could you live with the (now private) upgradeFrom() method? This method is actually taking a QTcpSocket and 'upgrades' it to a QWebSocket.
Do you process the handshake yourself? The dataprocessor only takes care of data after a successful handshake has been exchanged.
It is however a very interesting use case and should definitely be explored further.
Can you add a feature request in Jira?
> 
> I see it's currently reading from an QIODevice which should be ok, but what is unfortunate
> is that QWebSocketFrame::readFrame(pIoDevice); blocks!
> 
> The problem is exactly what you already wrote as comment there:
>        case PS_WAIT_FOR_MORE_DATA:
>            //TODO: waitForReadyRead should really be changed
>            //now, when a websocket is used in a GUI thread
>            //the GUI will hang for at most 5 seconds
>            //maybe, a QStateMachine should be used
I know, I will finetune this when I start with stress tests. Expect this to be changed in an upcoming release.

Cheers,

Kurt
> 
> -- 
> Best regards/Schöne Grüße
> 
> Martin
> 
> A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
> Q: Why is top posting bad?
> 
> ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
> /\                                   - against proprietary attachments
> 
> This mail was not scanned before sending.
> It was sent from a secure Linux desktop.
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development



More information about the Development mailing list