[Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

[Knoll Lars]

On 20/02/14 10:05, "Heikkinen Jani" <Jani.Heikkinen at digia.com> wrote:

>What I have discussed here the process has been to move stuff to the
>archive when new minor release is done. From that point of view archive
>is almost up to date, only 5.1.1 is missing.
>
>But it is also OK to put stuff to the archive when new release comes out
>if that is the wanted behavior.
>
>If I understood correctly the new "process" would be:
>
>- http://download.qt-project.org/official_releases/qt/ would have only
>latest releases( currently 5.2.1 & 4.8.5)
>
>- http://download.qt-project.org/archive/qt/ would have all releases
>(including latest ones)
>
>If this OK for everyone I can easily update these folders.

That sounds good to me. I’d say go ahead.

Cheers,
Lars

>
>
>Br,
>Jani
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=digia.com at qt-project.org
>> [mailto:development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=digia.com at qt-project.org]
>> On Behalf Of Matthew Woehlke
>> Sent: 19. helmikuuta 2014 18:14
>> To: development at qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the
>> archives
>> 
>> On 2014-02-19 10:33, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
>> > What do you think of this arrangement?:
>> > - When a packages are released, put them straight in the archive
>> 
>> Yes, please. It drives people that need to reference source packages by
>> URL (e.g. I bet this includes distro packagers) absolutely nuts to have
>> the canonical URL for a package change when a new version comes out.
>> 
>> --
>> Matthew
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>_______________________________________________
>Development mailing list
>Development at qt-project.org
>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development