[Development] Missing documentation

Gladhorn Frederik Frederik.Gladhorn at digia.com
Sat Feb 22 12:54:57 CET 2014


On Saturday 22. February 2014 18.04.01 Jason McDonald wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Sze Howe Koh <szehowe.koh at gmail.com>wrote:
> > The following functions/types need documenting. (This list excludes
> > constructors, destructors, and operators). Could those who are
> > familiar with these functions/types please add them?
> 
> Thanks for the info. The QTest items are genuine errors.  Most of them are
> related to overloaded functions, so it could be helpful for the future if
> your script includes the full signatures in the output.
> 
> I have prepared a patch to fix the QTest items --
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,78977
> 
> I also notice that there seems to be a Qt Doc Bot that comments on gerrit
> commits that reduce the number of qdoc errors. Is there anywhere that the
> set of errors seen by that bot is made visible?

Sure. Just run make docs and you see what the doc bot see. It does just that - run make docs before and after a patch and compares the output, complaining about added lines (after sorting them).
I agree though that we should make it easier to see all qdoc errors somewhere.

Greetings,
Frederik


More information about the Development mailing list