[Development] Qt Wayland versioning
Nichols Andy
Andy.Nichols at digia.com
Sat Jan 4 14:27:11 CET 2014
Hi Tomasz,
Yes you are correct. As of last week we now depend on qtbase/stable in qtwayland/stable so the version number does need to be changed now. We are a bit out of sync now with regard to following dev and stable with the rest of Qt (despite using those names) but that can be resolved fairly easily now. Feel free to submit a patch correcting this, otherwise I'll fix it when I'm back in the office next week.
Regards,
Andy Nichols
________________________________
From: development-bounces+andy.nichols=digia.com at qt-project.org [development-bounces+andy.nichols=digia.com at qt-project.org] on behalf of Tomasz Olszak [olszak.tomasz at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 6:11 PM
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Qt Wayland versioning
Currently qtwayland/stable depends on qtbase/stable and still has 5.1.0 in .qmake.conf. When I built it I ended up with QtWaylandClient/5.1.0/QtWaylandClient/private/* private headers created.
Am I right thinking that despite Qt Wayland is marked as addon module it should follow the regular/essential modules versioning?
--
regards,
Tomasz Olszak
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20140104/dd39f466/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list