[Development] Adding Enginio (qtenginio) to the Qt release

Alan Alpert 416365416c at gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 20:52:01 CET 2014

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Qi Liang <Liang.Qi at digia.com> wrote:
> What is qt modularization for? We want to have different release cycles for different qt modules.

As I recall, that means we want to be able to have different
release/versioning cycles, but there will still be a regular Qt
release package containing some version of all essential modules (and
compatible with some version of all addon modules) even if some
haven't bumped their version.

> Then +1 for that.
> For offline installer, I suggest, a separate installer for it, but it should based on installed qt directory. It is compatible with 5.2.0 release in this way.
> For online installer, every module is an option, then not much difference there.

Isn't this the distinction between addon modules and essential
modules? Is Frederik asking for enginio to become a "Qt Essential"
module? Or am I a little behind in my terminology?

Alan Alpert

More information about the Development mailing list