[Development] Removing maemo/meego code?

Knoll Lars Lars.Knoll at digia.com
Thu Jul 31 09:17:16 CEST 2014


I’m all for removing the code. The XI2 implementation for the N9 is non
standard, and neither the N900 nor the N9 will see any updates in the
future (unfortunately).

Cheers,
Lars

On 30/07/14 00:07, "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" <kde at carewolf.com> wrote:

>Hi everybody
>
>While working on XInput2 I have been worried about the state of the
>special 
>maemo xinput2 code-paths since no one was using it and it wasn't tested.
>I decided to try to remove it for Qt 5.4, but felt bad for only doing a
>partial job in remove maemo code, so I have made an experimental patch to
>remove all maemo/meego specific code from qtbase. I have talked with
>Robin 
>Burchell from Sailfish and they don't use any of these specific parts
>either.
>
>So do anyone else use them and want to maintain them?
>
>See https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/90909/ ?
>
>Best regards
>`Allan Jensen
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Development mailing list
>Development at qt-project.org
>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development



More information about the Development mailing list