[Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM

Samuel Gaist samuel.gaist at edeltech.ch
Mon Jun 2 16:06:24 CEST 2014

On 2 juin 2014, at 16:01, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:

> Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 11:23:16, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
>> this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something
>> isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing
>> features of qml/quick? you should aim at bringing this into the
>> qtdeclarative repository, possibly directly into one of the existing
>> modules. all the "sandboxing" you need is the review (series) you will
>> create on gerrit anyway.
> I think the answer is pretty clear: because there are 10 other RPC solutions 
> and this needs to be harmonised.
> And, to be honest, a Qt-only solution is not the most ideal. I think we should 
> use an RPC that is available in other toolkits.
> -- 
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Aren't we getting the state machine thread mixed with the RPC thread ?

More information about the Development mailing list