[Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Mon Jun 2 17:28:28 CEST 2014
Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 16:06:24, Samuel Gaist escreveu:
> On 2 juin 2014, at 16:01, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
> > Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 11:23:16, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
> >> this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something
> >> isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing
> >> features of qml/quick? you should aim at bringing this into the
> >> qtdeclarative repository, possibly directly into one of the existing
> >> modules. all the "sandboxing" you need is the review (series) you will
> >> create on gerrit anyway.
> > I think the answer is pretty clear: because there are 10 other RPC
> > solutions and this needs to be harmonised.
> > And, to be honest, a Qt-only solution is not the most ideal. I think we
> > should use an RPC that is available in other toolkits.
> Aren't we getting the state machine thread mixed with the RPC thread ?
Yes, we are.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development