[Development] Enginio build artifacts and naming conventions
stephen.kelly at kdab.com
Wed Jun 4 11:00:15 CEST 2014
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:08:12 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > The library filenames for Enginio do not have a version in their basename
> > at all, as was discussed and actioned for all modules before Qt 5.0. Is
> > that a mistake, or is this stuff a free-for-all for all new modules?
> The source version number is only required once you break source
> compatibility, so it's technically not required now.
The '5' makes sense because it is 'part of Qt5'. It is part of the
> However, I question why we have a Qt module that doesn't have "Qt" in the
So far, we know it is deliberate. We don't know if it was a mistake, and we
don't know if naming things is a free-for-all.
Lars: Can you answer? Is there a way to name include directories and libraries
or is it a free-for-all? Can future modules be expected to follow any naming
conventions, or is it expected that they can be named anything?
Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com
Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
More information about the Development