[Development] Proposal: All Qt modules must use the same version number
stephen.kelly at kdab.com
Mon Jun 30 09:36:39 CEST 2014
On Friday, June 27, 2014 13:10:17 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em sex 27 jun 2014, às 21:28:41, André Pönitz escreveu:
> > This pretty much sounds like "If a module uses private API it should
> > follow Qt Core numbering, if it doesn't it's free to pick anything."
> Sounds like a good compromise to me.
Not to me.
1) A module may start not using private API and add it later.
2) It is an increase in 'the number of standards'. That is not useful.
> If a module wants to release out-of-schedule, it will need to use an extra
> version number, like 188.8.131.52.
And 184.108.40.206 and 220.127.116.11 etc.
The time between patch releases is already very short. Even the time between
minor releases is reliably short at 6 months.
Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com
Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
More information about the Development