[Development] Enginio build artifacts and naming conventions

[Stephen Kelly]

On Monday, May 26, 2014 21:30:01 Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> El 26/05/14 20:54, Stephen Kelly escribió:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This tweet was brought to my attention:
> >   https://twitter.com/Korchkidu/status/470850176366968832
> > 
> > and it is true that the cmake files generated contain the incorrect
> > filename, compared to the actual files shipped.
> > 
> > The Enginio files are called something like
> > 
> >   libEnginio.so.1.0.5
> > 
> > instead of something like
> > 
> >   libQt5Enginio.so.5.x.y
> 
> you could probably check the comments in
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/83748 to get an idea about the naming.

Thanks, so it's deliberate. 

The above differences in the naming convention seem needless. The module could 
be versioned independently without that inconsistency in the filenames. 

The library filenames for Enginio do not have a version in their basename at 
all, as was discussed and actioned for all modules before Qt 5.0. Is that a 
mistake, or is this stuff a free-for-all for all new modules?

Thanks,

-- 
Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com

Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions