[Development] Enginio build artifacts and naming conventions

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue May 27 20:08:12 CEST 2014

Em ter 27 maio 2014, às 14:12:50, Stephen Kelly escreveu:
> The above differences in the naming convention seem needless. The module
> could  be versioned independently without that inconsistency in the
> filenames.
> The library filenames for Enginio do not have a version in their basename
> at  all, as was discussed and actioned for all modules before Qt 5.0. Is
> that a mistake, or is this stuff a free-for-all for all new modules?

The source version number is only required once you break source 
compatibility, so it's technically not required now.

However, I question why we have a Qt module that doesn't have "Qt" in the 

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Development mailing list