[Development] Enginio build artifacts and naming conventions
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue May 27 20:08:12 CEST 2014
Em ter 27 maio 2014, às 14:12:50, Stephen Kelly escreveu:
> The above differences in the naming convention seem needless. The module
> could be versioned independently without that inconsistency in the
> The library filenames for Enginio do not have a version in their basename
> at all, as was discussed and actioned for all modules before Qt 5.0. Is
> that a mistake, or is this stuff a free-for-all for all new modules?
The source version number is only required once you break source
compatibility, so it's technically not required now.
However, I question why we have a Qt module that doesn't have "Qt" in the
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development