[Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

Morten Johan Sørvig morten.sorvig at digia.com
Wed Oct 22 22:25:51 CEST 2014

> On 22 Oct 2014, at 15:13, Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen at theqtcompany.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:53:42PM +0200, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
>>> It looks like we have to leave this to to the deployment solution (macdeployqt does not deploy the file).
>> I understand, however then we get frameworks that cannot be code-signed if copied just straight from the folder just because this single .prl file.
> well, morten's point was that you wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) do
> that anyway (you should remove Headers).
>> Can you please share some details why this can be problematic to move .prl files one level up?
>> There are already .la files there, so accompanying .prl there will be even more consistent.
> well, i can buy that argument. "the filesystem layout is not very
> mac-like anyway".
> patches welcome. note that prls still need to be found at the old place.

Okay, if we think this can work then I can take a look.


More information about the Development mailing list