[Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes
oswald.buddenhagen at theqtcompany.com
Wed Oct 22 15:13:32 CEST 2014
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:53:42PM +0200, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
> > It looks like we have to leave this to to the deployment solution (macdeployqt does not deploy the file).
> I understand, however then we get frameworks that cannot be code-signed if copied just straight from the folder just because this single .prl file.
well, morten's point was that you wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) do
that anyway (you should remove Headers).
> Can you please share some details why this can be problematic to move .prl files one level up?
> There are already .la files there, so accompanying .prl there will be even more consistent.
well, i can buy that argument. "the filesystem layout is not very
patches welcome. note that prls still need to be found at the old place.
More information about the Development