[Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:53:42PM +0200, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
> > It looks like we have to leave this to to the deployment solution (macdeployqt does not deploy the file).
> 
> I understand, however then we get frameworks that cannot be code-signed if copied just straight from the folder just because this single .prl file.
> 
well, morten's point was that you wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) do
that anyway (you should remove Headers).

> Can you please share some details why this can be problematic to move .prl files one level up?
> 
> There are already .la files there, so accompanying .prl there will be even more consistent.
> 
well, i can buy that argument. "the filesystem layout is not very
mac-like anyway".

patches welcome. note that prls still need to be found at the old place.