[Development] Updating the licence policy for Qt Project

[Knoll Lars]

On 01/09/14 08:55, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:

>On Monday 01 September 2014 06:38:16 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> In terms of preference I think we should state that the license has to
>> include LGPLv3/commercial. It should include GPLv2 if this doesn’t
>> conflict with some other license used (ie. Apache 2.0).
>
>The question at hand is only whether we state a preference between GPLv2
>and 
>LGPLv2.1, in addition to the mandatory options of LGPLv3 and commercial.
>
>I believe we should not state a preference. The author of the module
>requesting the Git repositories should simply declare what they want.

Yes, both are welcome in the Qt Project :)

Cheers,
Lars