[Development] Updating the licence policy for Qt Project

[Thiago Macieira]

On Monday 01 September 2014 06:38:16 Knoll Lars wrote:
> In terms of preference I think we should state that the license has to
> include LGPLv3/commercial. It should include GPLv2 if this doesn’t
> conflict with some other license used (ie. Apache 2.0).

The question at hand is only whether we state a preference between GPLv2 and 
LGPLv2.1, in addition to the mandatory options of LGPLv3 and commercial.

I believe we should not state a preference. The author of the module 
requesting the Git repositories should simply declare what they want.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center