[Development] QTBUG-35892. QML XMLHttpRequest does not support the OPTIONS method.

Richard Moore rich at kde.org
Thu Sep 11 00:08:37 CEST 2014


On 10 September 2014 21:15, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
wrote:

> On Tuesday 09 September 2014 18:24:58 Валерий Котов wrote:
> > I realize that we had this discussion before. But I have to ask. =)
> > Does not it make sense to add method and type in Operations enum for
> > options in case we need some special treatment for "OPTIONS" verb?
>
> Only if we have a method for it and we're not adding one. If it's just
> sendCustomVerb, then we don't need an enum entry.
>
> By the way, do you know of who would need OPTIONS *? What's the use-case,
> who
> would use it and how do they do it today?
>
>
Given the previous discussions referenced from the working groups for
xmlhttprequest I think it's pretty clear that we can forget about OPTIONS
*. Just using a custom verb and implementing it in the xmlhttprequest
implementation of qml seems like the way to go.

Cheers

Rich.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20140910/68438616/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list