[Development] New company name for Qt part of Digia and unified web site
BogDan
bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 19 09:11:29 CEST 2014
> Your sentence is correct as long as the user *ships* qt libs alongside his
> apps! If the application uses system libraries, then IMHO, is not his
> responsibility to provide the sources for Qt.
Right. And when using Ministro, it's the Ministro packager's responsibility to
provide the sources. We should make Ministro packages officially part of the Qt
Project so that the official sources apply and we don't need to spply them
elsewhere.
Well, I was referring to linux distributions :). But you're right Ministro is the
same thing. Ministro packages *are* officially part of the Qt project! I'm doing
this job manually because we didn't had time to integrate it with the release
scripts (yet).But moving libs from *testing* to *stable* repository needs human
touch, because we don't want to move them if they have regressions and they
will break all existing apps out there :).
Cheers,
BogDan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20140919/a677a19b/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list