[Development] Qt Quick Controls for Embedded
Frederik Gladhorn
frederik.gladhorn at theqtcompany.com
Thu Apr 9 15:04:59 CEST 2015
We want to give you the code, here it is :)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/admin/projects/qt-labs/qtquickcontrols2
It is in the qt-labs namespace which means "no guarantees, no commitment,
we'll rename and break everything".
Besides this little warning, I think there is a great repository to play with
:)
Build it against the dev branch of Qt (that'll be 5.6 as minimum requirement
for now).
Feedback welcome!
Cheers,
Frederik
On Wednesday, April 08, 2015 03:18:27 PM Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as announced by JP's blog post, we've been working on a new set of Qt Quick
> Controls that have slightly different goals than the existing ones:
> http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/03/31/qt-quick-controls-for-embedded/
>
> The main target is performance, especially on low end hardware.
> The code will live in the qtquickcontrols module, next to the existing
> controls. For now there is only one style supported, with some theming
> capabilities. This is an important point to get top notch performance.
>
> Now is the time to give everyone the chance to play with the new controls
> which are at a "tech preview" level. Since the architecture is different, we
> want to keep a clean separation in the qtquickcontrols git module and will
> move the code around to accommodate both modules within the repository. The
> plan is to create two top level directories in the repository: a controls1
> directory containing everything currently in the repository
> (src/tests/examples), and a controls2 directory to contain the new controls.
>
> Note that both sets of controls will be co-installable and work together.
> That is to say, the following will work just fine:
>
> import QtQuick.Controls 1.x as Controls1
> import QtQuick.Controls 2.x
>
> After a long discussion, we think that going with a major version is
> easiest, as we didn't find a great name that makes it clear what the new
> control set provides; "Embedded Controls" or "Touch Controls" don't quite
> seem right.
>
> Greetings,
> Frederik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
More information about the Development
mailing list