[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

Bubke Marco Marco.Bubke at theqtcompany.com
Fri Dec 4 19:12:59 CET 2015

On December 4, 2015 17:49:08 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:

> On Friday 04 December 2015 16:20:44 Bubke Marco wrote:
>> The clang code model completes auto so it should be not that hard.  Actually
>> I would call an ordered map or unordered map a dictionary. 
> Does Creator have a way to reveal the deduced type of an auto? That would go a 
> long way to alleviating the pain of using it.

In the clang code model we use the clang AST. So if the compiler knows it, we can show it. It's on the roadmap for 3.7.

> -- 
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Sent from cellphone 

More information about the Development mailing list