[Development] Upgrading the sources to C++11 keywords (Q_NULLPTR, etc.)

Marc Mutz marc.mutz at kdab.com
Wed Feb 11 10:49:31 CET 2015

On Wednesday 11 February 2015 07:54:52 Hausmann Simon wrote:
> I suppose that it is absolutely unlikely that we are going to find a
> consensus on what is purely an aesthetic issue.
> I for one am entirely with André and I do not like UPPERCASE macros in my
> face unless I can avoid them. It's aesthetics and I suppose there is
> little that will change that.
> As approver I will approve code that uses Q_NULLPTR but I expect others
> reviewing my code to respect my preference to use 0 until we can use
> nullptr.

Apart from the claim that there is nothing technical in this discussion, I 
agree with the above. Respect the preference of the guy who codes. I like 
simple rules. This is one.

Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions

More information about the Development mailing list