[Development] Upgrading the sources to C++11 keywords (Q_NULLPTR, etc.)

[Marc Mutz]

On Wednesday 11 February 2015 10:56:29 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 February 2015 10:49:31 Marc Mutz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 February 2015 07:54:52 Hausmann Simon wrote:
> > > I suppose that it is absolutely unlikely that we are going to find a
> > > consensus on what is purely an aesthetic issue.
> > > 
> > > I for one am entirely with André and I do not like UPPERCASE macros in
> > > my face unless I can avoid them. It's aesthetics and I suppose there
> > > is little that will change that.
> > > 
> > > As approver I will approve code that uses Q_NULLPTR but I expect others
> > > reviewing my code to respect my preference to use 0 until we can use
> > > nullptr.
> > 
> > Apart from the claim that there is nothing technical in this discussion,
> > I agree with the above. Respect the preference of the guy who codes. I
> > like simple rules. This is one.
> 
> I prefer using curly braces for if even if there is only one line.
> This is what the KDE coding style mandate, it makes diff smaller when you
> add or remove lines, and it helps preventing mistakes likes the "goto
> fail; goto fail;" one.
> Am i going to be allowed to use curly braces?

I, for one, won't stop you.

-- 
Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions