[Development] qtchooser (was: Re: Adding new third party component three.js to Qt?)

[Thiago Macieira]

On Sunday 18 January 2015 06:15:45 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I also see how it happened: You were convinced that it was possible to
> > solve the problem in a different way (qtchooser) and so accepted to
> > implement that. Unfortunately, that implementation does not fulfill the
> > distributions' actual requirements, so we are back to square one.
> 
> PS: Fedora has always had exactly one requirement: that the binaries get the
> -qtN suffix (the packaging convention we and other distros have been using
> for years, even for Qt 4). Therefore, any solution that does not include
> such a suffix does by definition not fulfill our requirements.

Understood, but we need you to be flexible if you want this conversation to 
continue.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center