[Development] qtchooser (was: Re: Adding new third party component three.js to Qt?)

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Jan 20 05:14:33 CET 2015


On Tuesday 20 January 2015 00:57:55 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > qdbus should be the same in all versions. I don't plan on making breaking
> > changes in the future -- I can't see what I could do to create such
> > problems...
> 
> I just wrote an example in another mail, supposing a feature is added.
> 
> We might argue that the same could be said for assistant, but at least that
> one is fairly obvious to spot ;)

Indeed, applications wouldn't be able to depend on the new feature because 
"qdbus" would be the old, Qt 4 version.

Which is why I think the solution of having some binaries be declared "user 
applications" and the other "non-user-facing tools" was superior. But it's not 
the solution we went for.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center




More information about the Development mailing list