[Development] qtchooser (was: Re: Adding new third party component three.js to Qt?)
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Jan 20 05:14:33 CET 2015
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 00:57:55 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > qdbus should be the same in all versions. I don't plan on making breaking
> > changes in the future -- I can't see what I could do to create such
> > problems...
>
> I just wrote an example in another mail, supposing a feature is added.
>
> We might argue that the same could be said for assistant, but at least that
> one is fairly obvious to spot ;)
Indeed, applications wouldn't be able to depend on the new feature because
"qdbus" would be the old, Qt 4 version.
Which is why I think the solution of having some binaries be declared "user
applications" and the other "non-user-facing tools" was superior. But it's not
the solution we went for.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development
mailing list