[Development] qtchooser (was: Re: Adding new third party component three.js to Qt?)

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

On Monday 19 January 2015 20:14:33 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 00:57:55 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
> > > qdbus should be the same in all versions. I don't plan on making
> > > breaking
> > > changes in the future -- I can't see what I could do to create such
> > > problems...
> > 
> > I just wrote an example in another mail, supposing a feature is added.
> > 
> > We might argue that the same could be said for assistant, but at least
> > that
> > one is fairly obvious to spot ;)
> 
> Indeed, applications wouldn't be able to depend on the new feature because
> "qdbus" would be the old, Qt 4 version.
> 
> Which is why I think the solution of having some binaries be declared "user
> applications" and the other "non-user-facing tools" was superior. But it's
> not the solution we went for.

But maybe now with two years of experience is a subject we need to reopen.

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20150120/b347f0ac/attachment.sig>