[Development] Replace QtXml backend
Cristian Adam
cristian.adam at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 23:21:02 CEST 2015
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Gerhard Scheikl <g.scheikl at avibit.com
<mailto:g.scheikl at avibit.com>> wrote:
I didn't fully think it through yet, was just an idea. :)
> > So we came up with the idea to replace the back-end with Xerces
and try to
> > leave the Qt API part the same.
>
> That's interesting.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Thiago Macieira
<thiago.macieira at intel.com <mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com>> wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2015 09:58:42 Gerhard Scheikl wrote:
> > How is it licensed?
>
> Apache 2.0
This is a deal-breaker.
Gerhard, have you also tested libxml2
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libxml2>? Unlike Xerces, libxml2 is MIT
licensed.
Cheers,
Cristian.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20150727/7a0b5c14/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list