[Development] Replace QtXml backend

Cristian Adam cristian.adam at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 23:21:02 CEST 2015


On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Gerhard Scheikl <g.scheikl at avibit.com 
<mailto:g.scheikl at avibit.com>> wrote:


    I didn't fully think it through yet, was just an idea. :)

     > > So we came up with the idea to replace the back-end with Xerces
    and try to
     > > leave the Qt API part the same.
     >
     > That's interesting.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Thiago Macieira 
<thiago.macieira at intel.com <mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com>> wrote:

    On Monday 27 July 2015 09:58:42 Gerhard Scheikl wrote:
     > > How is it licensed?
     >
     > Apache 2.0

    This is a deal-breaker.


Gerhard, have you also tested libxml2 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libxml2>? Unlike Xerces, libxml2 is MIT 
licensed.

Cheers,
Cristian.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20150727/7a0b5c14/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list