[Development] Some Qt3D feedback

[Thiago Macieira]

On Monday 15 June 2015 13:01:04 Sean Harmer wrote:
> * The existing syncqt.pl works

syncqt actually has support for namespaces so you could #include <NS/Class> 
but I think it's disabled since it has some bugs and nothing is using it. We 
could re-enable it.

Note that the namespace should not be the same as the module name. If we're 
going to use the module name, we should simply make qdoc stop suggesting 
#include <Class> for this module and qmake not add -I$QTDIR/include/Module. 
That way, people have to #include <QtModule/Class> and there would be no 
clash.

> * Code written with a using directive still looks like Qt code

That's their problem.

> Although we could recommend people to not use using directives we can't 
> enforce it (nor should we) so the expense of the single repeated Q 
> seemed like the least onerous option. Not ideal, but a compromise from 
> the other options.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center