[Development] Removing the -c++11 option from configure

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Mar 24 21:23:25 CET 2015

On Tuesday 24 March 2015 20:20:46 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > And all for what? What do people gain by passing -no-c++11 today?
> they can (at least hypothetically) test their stuff with older language
> versions without installing a second compiler (and forcing qt to use it,
> which is a royal pita).

They who?

Do you mean "we", as in developers of Qt itself? Is this really required or 
should people edit the mkspec? Aside from an option for the CI to test non-
C++11, why do we need it?

If you mean any other group of people, I don't see how they're relevant.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Development mailing list