[Development] Tagging private symbols as such

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

On miércoles, 7 de diciembre de 2016 02:23:15 ART Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
[snip] 
> > I wonder: do we want a different ELF version for the QPA bits, other than
> > Qt_5_PRIVATE_API?
> 
> IMHO, we want a versioned one, but in both cases. Distinguishing between QPA
> and other private bits does not really matter though, if they have the same
> (lack of) ABI guarantees.

The same could be said from the Debian side. If you find it useful to have a 
different ELF version we will just need to adjust a couple of scripts, but as 
long as we can determine that those are private symbols, everything is fine.

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20161207/403501d8/attachment.sig>