[Development] [QLockFile] Whether it is reasonable to use 0644 permission ?

Albert Astals Cid albert.astals at canonical.com
Wed Jul 27 09:41:34 CEST 2016


FWIW this is slightly related to https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53570

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Denis Shienkov
<denis.shienkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> and let the umask determine which bits to exclude.
>
> what do you mean here? why we need to use umask, and why we need to exclude
> bits?
>
>
> 27.07.2016 10:01, Thiago Macieira пишет:
>>
>> On quarta-feira, 27 de julho de 2016 09:49:14 PDT Denis Shienkov wrote:
>>>
>>> Why just do not use 0666 permissions for this?
>>
>> We should use 0666 and let the umask determine which bits to exclude.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development



More information about the Development mailing list